my superluminal accelerator project nuclear physics can also be one more area that i'm not afraid to dabble in
on an amateur level. the attempt to model the atom has spun all sorts
sorts of debate and confusion... especially noticed in misunderstood discoveries along the lines of the ill-named cold fusion. guidelines have been made to explain the observed behaviors which seem to be to govern subatomic
particles, but those policies commonly are not permitted to flex if the model is as well
limited to encompass newly dicovered behaviors. einstein proved to get fairly right during the rules he outlined in his
normal and special theories of relativity. nonetheless, his explanation of individuals models in many cases are refuted at this time. (i'm reminded in the poker scene from star trek: the following generation where steven hawking, played by himself, displays his cards to ol' albert exclaiming, "wrong again,
Office Professional Plus 2010 X86, einstein.") while i agree that the principles of his unique theory
remain true, it is the model and interperatation of that theory that i wish to prove incorrect. when einstein observed that mercury, fastest with the planets, seemed to
increase inertial momentum away from the sun the faster it travelled (along an eliptical orbit), he correctly identified a rule of exceptional relativity. this also described the behavior of near-light particles
in nuclear colliders,
Office 2010 Professional 32bit, which would approach unswervable momentum and release greater-than-expected energy yeilds the closer it approached the so-called 'speed of light.' to my horror, i've heard this explained in (what i consider to get) the
most untenable rationales that one could believe. the increase of inertial
momentum is attributed to "an approach toward infinite mass and
infinitesimal depth". to make matters worse,
Microsoft Office 2010 Activation, this thinking is popularized by minds and great and imaginitive as isaac asimov... but they're wrong. if there exists an ether which acts like a cosmic luminal medium,
Microsoft Office Pro Plus 2007 Serial, then
it however awaits proof of its existence by some characteristic behavior.
in theory, it limits the speed at which energy is conducted. in practice,
its a component of an antiquated model using it as a prop for which it
serves no particular function. without identifiable behavior,
Office Pro 2010 32 Bit, it serves
no purpose in our matter-model. i believe it has only served to model a misunderstanding about what is erroneously called 'the speed of light,'
a term for which i have a completely different definition:
Microsoft Office Pro Plus 2007 Serial s su
Linear Mode
