Man was a liar fraudulent use of {personality} do

journalist in Yingjie Wang Qiang told journalists
Bank: cheated chiefly Qiaomou delinquency


case, the decide warned that ID cards as the most major private identity documents, necessitated by decree, individuals must keep, this is a legal obligation; ID cards to acquaintances borrowing is unlawful. If the loss because of their effect, or easily by being evil intentions of the
lasts over half an hour, afresh with Liu Jiandong, who Qiaomou contact, the other phone off, Qiaomou he felt bad, swiftly to the bank to retard the results on account of the money has been in another places auto teller machine in batches to take the light.

reporter knowledgeable that the province of the judicial practice of courts, verdict ashore alike cases are too generally the case, accented that the public identification of safe custody obligations. distress. (Man, parties are not his real name)
Qiaomou 50-year-old, was originally a made curtains Baoying The self-employed, speak almost the deceit, he has a staying panic. In the grumble filed apt the tribunal, the Qiaomou approximately what had occurred.
Qiaomou: status review bank failed to meet obligations



Bank further pointed out that the cases, resulting in Qiaomou 50,000 yuan cheated the main reason for their own negligence. Even if banks have Qiaomou complained of so-called


Qiaomou, banks responsible there is no contractual relationship among banks, the bank entirely Qiaomou review obligations to others for personal accommodation account, and caused him loss of fault grounds for requesting an mandate bank responsibility, tort squabbles.
Not long ago, the Ministry reviewed in questioning users' questions, if the fraudulent use of identity card is lost by others, to another person and review the department should bear the corresponding legal responsibility, loss of documents were not assume any responsibility. In fact, when the community identity improper care, really do was take a book,the north face jacket, bank cards, deposits impersonator or fraud, the individual or to take risks. Recently, the court concluded the Baoying tricked the public with a typical infringement case sued the bank. Qiaomou plaintiff made a Despite repeated protestations, but the court ruling Liu Cheng Qiaomou assume responsibility for their own loss; bank has failed to meet the rigorous review of the ID card obligations, 4 percent responsibility.
consensus with the regulations, Liu Jiandong to the bank to regulatory review, but the bank equitable by Liu Jiandong take the
Liu Jiandong, who pretentiously told Qiaomou, to sign a compact immediately, and quickly deposit accounts of $ 50,000, or hospital leadership will mistrust your competence Loaning. Liu Jiandong left,dsquared online, Qiao Mouli that of $ 50,000 into account. In fact, this 50,000 yuan deposited in the name of Liu Jiandong, who set up accounts with Qiaomou.


obligation to keep personal ID



case, the judge told reporters, State Department, the chief bank are apparently defined, monetary creations, an individual deposit accounts off, I should be inquired to generate identification documents,asics cooper, account petition message to the depositor the authenticity, honesty compliance review. Case, the bank holds in Liu Jiandong, individual accounts, but the banks could get not evidence that Liu Jiandong and Qiaomou the photo ID card are quite similar. Therefore, the bank does not Kejin review obligations, the loss is caused by Qiaomou a ingredient, as proper, should bear the loss of 40% Qiaomou.


early November last annual,kobe zoom 6, Liu Jiandong, and others captured. March 12, Baoying criminal courts to make judgments for fraud sentenced Liu Jiandong 10 years in jail and a half out of the earnings of Liu Jiandong not be revived should be returned Qiaomou $ 50,000. However, Qiaomou not been revived is tired, so he told the court, requiring banks to recompense 50,000 yuan loss.
as a defendant, the banks feel more wronged. During the trial, they argued,中学抗震加固工程发生事故2人被埋, in the process of Qiaomou passbook account, the staff shall review the Bank does not have any subjective fault.

court -
court battle -
judge reminded -
this case, perhaps somebody ambition Qiaomou done an injustice, but in truth, do not try to Qiaomou of identity and liability to reserve appropriate books, of lesson, to take responsibility because the deception.




face decrees, some human had doubts: Not long antecedent, the public security sector is no reiterated: If fraudulent use of identity cards is lost along others,四川泸州多名女中学生遭遇性侵犯 最小者仅13岁, to dissimilar human and review the ministry ought bear the corresponding valid responsibility,jordan retro shoes, loss of documents were no suppose anyone duty? How this statement with the court's sentence namely not the same ah?
judge said, passbook deposits, as in charge of their important documents, and identity, as Qiaomou should be properly kept. The book was transferred Qiaomou pack, and did not take agreeable care of identification,男子酒后请人代驾醒后发现被甩路边, is deceived of the 2 important causes of deposits, are indispensable. As Qiaomou of identity papers and books to improper care of cheated depositors to bear responsibility for Liu Cheng.

Lou Hidaka mention, the hospital maneuvers customized 200 curtain due to sign a contract needs to Qiaomou cater business authorize and ID cards; said to be on Qiaomou verification, so that him to open a bank account and deposited $ 50,000. Qiaomou to make this
afterward day, Liu Jiandong, who's identity card with Qiaomou organized a imitation ID Qiaomou holds this ######## ID, they are in the appoint of the bank to open Qiaomou an list.

to do with the identity card was fraudulent book
the incident -


Qiaomou reason is that the all episode, leading to his cheated of $ 50,000, because the bank had violated the State Department relevant provisions of the outcome.
final July 17, a self-styled hospital. To the outpatient establishing, Liu Jiandong phoned
is true. Reporters learned that in real life, once the public identification unsuitable attention, who take it do wrong things truly are, for example, do a writing with a copy of ID card or bank card, to perpetrate fraud or additional guilty doings,discount asics mexico 66 shoes, the people themselves or to take hazards.



liar and copy the account to take advantage of the book Qiaomou memorize the moment the fashionable account, put the book showed Liu Jiandong, who write down the account. Let Qiaomou did not expect that, on the surface, Liu Jiandong, who returned after copy complete account books, but in fact, account of the work to take advantage of copy, Liu Jiandong, who have books Although, as is Liu Jiandong, who opened the book.