Quick Search


Tibetan singing bowl music,sound healing, remove negative energy.

528hz solfreggio music -  Attract Wealth and Abundance, Manifest Money and Increase Luck



 
Your forum announcement here!

  Free Advertising Forums | Free Advertising Board | Post Free Ads Forum | Free Advertising Forums Directory | Best Free Advertising Methods | Advertising Forums > Other Methods of FREE Advertising > Online Classifieds Directory

Online Classifieds Directory Online Classifieds are an often over looked method of FREE Advertising and way of getting your brand name out there, but just ask around...they work, if you work them.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-01-2011, 01:45 PM   #1
sangma49
 
Posts: n/a
Default Tiffany Silver or Batters' Park Factor

Stathead: Our New Sabermetrics Website /
BBref.com Cell
S-R:
MLB |
NBA ·
CBB |
NFL ·
CFB |
NHL |
Oly |
Stathead

Mobile Site You Are Here >
Home >
About Baseball-Reference.com >
Park Adjustments
Park Adjustments Total
Baseball to get the whole nuts and bolts of the thing. It is very
involved to calculate,Pandora Jewellery Sale, and would probably be beyond the scope of my
freshman calc classes.
-->
These numbers are difficult to calculate and I would refer you to a
copy of Total Baseball if you wish to recreate the park factor values.
The value indicate a number above 100 is a park good for hitters
and below 100 is a park good for pitchers. The ERA+ and PRO+ values
are adjusted to both the league average and the park the pitcher or
batter played in.
The career totals are gathered by finding what a league average
player would have done given the same playing time as the player in
question and then summing these values up over the player's career.
Given how I store the seasonal data (as an ER total not the league
ERA) it is very easy to calculate. Similarly for PRO+ (league times
on base and league total bases).
Note that the lg_ERA and lg_OPS values are for a league average
player in that ballpark for single season data, and for a league
average player with the same career path as the given player. This
means that two players from the same league will have different values
here if they played in different parks. Calculation of Park Factors
I largely follow the method spelled out below. Historically, B-R
has been using single-year park factors for recent years and 3-year
park factors historically. I have changed that to now use 3-year
factors by default for all years. Of course, the current season is
only really a 2-year factor. The current year and last year. This can
lead to some big changes in the numbers, from what had been on the
site.
Two other major differences.
1) Interleague games are not used in the
calculation. They really mess things up because in some games the
teams have the DH and in others they don't. These series are also
typically not home and home series.
2) For the years 1957 and on, I use runs per 27 outs used rather
than runs per game (the IPC is always 1.00 in these cases). This is
more accurate than using IPC.
Overall, these two changes make only small changes to the numbers,
but I believe them to be more accurate this way.
This information is taken from an Archived
Copy of the now defunct TotalBaseball.com website. THIS DOES NOT
BELONG TO ME AND MAY BE REMOVED IF I AM ASKED TO DO SO BY A
REPRESENTATIVE OF TOTALBASEBALL.COM.
PARK FACTOR Calculated separately for batters and
pitchers. Above 100 signifies a park favorable to hitters; below 100
signifies a park favorable to pitchers. The computation of PF is
admittedly daunting, and what follows is probably of interest to the
merest handful of readers, but we feel obliged to state the
mathematical underpinnings for those few who may care. We use a
three-year average Park Factor for players and teams unless they
change home parks. Then a two-year average is used, unless the park
existed for only one year. Then a one-year mark is used. If a team
started up in Year 1, played two years in the first park, one in the
next, and three in the park after that and then stopped play,Tiffany Earrings, the
average would be as follows (where Fn is the one-year park factor for
year n):

Year 1 and 2 = (F1 + F2)/2 Year 4 = (F4 + F5)/2 Year 3 = F3 Year 5 = (F4 + F5 + F6)/3 Year 6 = (F5 + F6)/2

Step 1. Find games, losses, and runs scored and allowed for each
team at home and on the road. Take runs per game scored and allowed at
home over runs per game scored and allowed on the road. This is the
initial figure, but we must make two corrections to it.

Step 2. The first correction is for innings pitched at home and on
the road. This is a bit complicated, so the mathematically faint of
heart may want to head back at this point. First, find the team's home
winning percentage (wins at home over games at home). Do the same for
road games. Calculate the Innings Pitched Corrector (IPC) shown
below. If it is greater than 1, this means the innings pitched on the
road are higher because the other team is batting more often in the
last of the ninth. This rating is divided by the Innings Pitched
Corrector, like so:

(18.5 -- Wins at home / Games at home) IPC = ----------------------------------- (18.5 -- Losses on road / Games on road)

Note: 18.5 is the average number of half-innings per game if the
home team always bats in the ninth.

Step 3. Make corrections for the fact that the other road parks'
total difference from the league average is offset by the park rating
of the club that is being rated. Multiply rating by this Other Parks
Corrector (OPC):

No. of teams OPC=---------------------------------- No. of teams - 1 + Run Factor, team

(Note that this OPC differs from that presented earlier in The
Hidden Game of Baseball, for in preparing the pre-1900 data for Total
Baseball, we discovered that for some parks with extreme
characteristics, like Chicago's Lake Front Park of 1884, which had a
Home Run Factor of nearly 5, the earlier formula produced wrong
results. For parks with factors of 1.5 or less, either formula works
well.)

Example. In 1982, Atlanta scored 388 runs and allowed 387 runs at
home in 81 games, and scored 351 and allowed 315 on the road in 81
games. The initial factor is (775/81) / (666/81) = 1.164. The Braves'
home record was 42-39, or .519, and their road record was 47-34, or
.580. Thus the IPC = (18.5 - .519) / (18.5 - .420) = .995. The team
rating is now 1.164/.995 = 1.170. The OPC = (12) / (12 - 1 + 1.170) =
.986. The final runs-allowed rating is 1.170 X .986, or 1.154.

We warned you it wouldn't be easy!

The batter adjustment factor is composed of two parts, one the park
factor and the other the fact that a batter does not have to face his
own team's pitchers. The initial correction takes care of only the
second factor. Start with the following (SF = Scoring Factor,
previously determined [for Atlanta, 1.154], and SF1 = Scoring Factor
of the other clubs [NT = number of teams]):

SF - 1 1 - ----- NT - 1

Next is an iterative process in which the initial team pitching
rating is assumed to be 1, and the following factors are employed:

RHT, RAT= Runs per game scored at home (H) and away (A) by
team,

OHT,Tiffany Jewelers, OAT= Runs per game allowed at home,Tiffany Silver, away, by team

RAL = Runs per game for all games in the league.

Now, with the Team Pitching Rating (TPR) = 1,Tiffany And Co, we proceed to
calculate Team Batting Rating (TBR):

|RAT RHT| | TPR-1| |--- + ---| |1+ -----| |SF1 SF | | NT- 1| TBR=------------------------------ RAL

|OAT OHT| | TBR-1| |--- + ---| |1+ -----| |SF1 SF | | NT- 1| TPR=------------------------------ RAL

The last two steps are repeated three more times. The final Batting
Corrector, or Batters' Park Factor (BPF) is

(SF + SF1) BPF=---------------- | | TPR-1 | | |2 X |1+ -----| | | | NT-1 | |

Similarly,Tiffany Engagement, the final Pitching Corrector, or Pitchers' Park Factor
(PPF) is

(SF + SF1) PPF=---------------- | | TBR-1 | | |2 X |1+ -----| | | | NT-1 | |

Now an example, using the 1982 Atlanta Braves once again.

388 351 RHT - --- - 4.79 RAT - --- - 4.33 81 81

387 315 OHT - --- = 4.78 OAT - --- = 3.89 81 81

7947 RAL = --- = 8.18 NT = 12 972

|1.154-1| SF = 1.154 SF1=1-|-------|=.986 | 11 |

|4.33 4.79| | 1- 1| |--- + ----| |1+ --- | |.986 1.154| | 11 | TBR=---------------------------=1.044 8.18

|3.89 4.78| | 1.044- 1| |--- + ----| |1+ --------| |.986 1.154| | 11 | TBR=---------------------------=.993 8.18

Repeating these steps gives a TBR of 1.04 and a TPR of .97. The
Batters' Park Factor is

(1.170 + .986) BPF=----------------=1.07 | | 99-1 | | |2 X |1+ ----| | | | 11 | |

This is not a great deal removed from taking the original
ratio,

1.170 + 1 --------- , which is 1.08 2

The Pitchers' Park Factor may be calculated in analogous
fashion.

To apply the Batters' Park Factor to Batting Runs, one must use
this formula:

BR uncorr. BR = ------------------------------------------------------ corr. Runs (league) Runs (league) AB+BB+HBP ------------- - ---------- X (BPF - 1) X --------- AB+BB+HBP AB+BB+HBP (player or team) (league) (league)

For example, if a player produces 20 runs above average in 700
plate appearances with a Batters' Park Factor of 1.10, and the league
average of runs produced per plate appearance is .11, this means that
the player's uncorrected Batting Runs is 20 over the zero point of 700
X .11 (77 runs). In other words, 77 runs is the average run
contribution expected of this batter were he playing in an average
home park. But because his Batters' Park Factor is 1.10, which means
his home park was 10 percent kinder to hitters (than the average), you
would really expect an average run production of 1.1 X 77, or 85
runs. Thus the player whose uncorrected Batting Runs is 97 with a BF
of 1.1 is only +10 runs rather than +20, and 10 is his Park Adjusted
Batting Runs (in the Player Register, BR/A):

10 = 20/1.10 - .11 X (1.10 - 1) X 700.
  Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old 08-01-2011, 01:57 PM   #2
t5uun2ng6tg
Commander In Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 839
t5uun2ng6tg is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

,belstaff uk

| Back to logs list

2197111 2009 年 07 月 22 日 11:43 Reading (loading. ..) Comments (1) Category: Personal Diary
I am a very shy person,belstaff online, sometimes very stiff, can be, this is not what I want, I'm not so shallow too caught any one person can tell,belstaff jacket, how lonely I need to talk to people comfort. No one relative,belstaff jackets outlet, I would rather a lonely since the Department does not speak does not mean I do not tell,belstaff outlet, do not tell does not mean I'm not impulsive desire.

groom who I am I'm not looking back



has missed the blooming season has been missed



hand in hand That's

days of my wading Qianshan Wan



marching in the rain Cheng Zhaofeng from

only opened your hijab



only glance at the curve of your eyebrow if you a shy



water rose very delicate like a lotus flower in full bloom

In my heart,belstaff sale, after parting

into the memory of my life and never forget who I am



groom for whom this life before singing

Sansei Stone Wishing

five centuries of devout Buddhist prayer is



life in just to look at you if



only to

pass you by in life where all the Acacia

you

a bow buried in the soft
t5uun2ng6tg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:40 PM.

 

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Free Advertising Forums | Free Advertising Message Boards | Post Free Ads Forum