abercrombie shop Standing height of Gadamer illust

His philosophy, we find that his people's concern and attention. He explored the world of human experience and life practice, the whole world in the sense of metaphor is a text, to be understood who are readers, people living in this world, inevitably going to understand, read this world, understand this constitutes a limited and in the historic. To some of the comments on Gadamer's difficult to ask: has the original meaning of the world? Or have an objective standard to regulate our understanding of it? If so, then why generations of people to stick to questioning and looking for? If so, show the world how rich it? from the perspective of critics obviously can not give a satisfactory answer, and from Gadamer's hermeneutic point of view to look at these issues, but it can give us more great inspiration. Ask questions of the world the truth, perhaps only people actively involved in understanding, creating, in order to make the world more rich, human existence can be answered with significance.

1, Gadamer's view of language - who have language, whoever has the world

Gadamer Truth and Method in the third part of the explanation set out his view of language learning . The study of language is to explain the premise, as Gadamer all understanding is proposed to explain, and interpretations of all media in the language. To understand, one must be kept in the language. Gadamer in criticizing the traditional view of language, based on the study from the domain ontology as a language.

Gadamer things that people only listen to the language, to grasp the thing itself exist. It is because of neglect of modern science and the language of things, just the thing as a free to use and consumption of materials, which leads to things away from us, and even the existence of a confrontation with people. The relationship between language and existence and performance of ontology language and human relationships, language is a fundamental human way of existence in the world. People through language exchange, we have the knowledge of self and the world are surrounded by language. Only in the language that people can feel at home, to grow up, language is like the air we breathe, like not a moment to leave. Language is the medium of human existence truly has a language other than the language as a tool for understanding the world, has dominated the world not to be in the world. Gadamer against an objective method of natural science, and trying to experience art and history found in the general method of hermeneutics. He explained that the concept of beauty is important to study, he critically absorbed the aesthetic theories of Plato, emphasized the clarity of which is the essence of beauty, the United States focused on the requirements of the human soul, shining thing of beauty but also to U.S. self-evident. This is an existence of light, visible light to make something else a while he became visible. Gadamer existence will be the introduction of light to understand the world, he thought the language to light the way to make things intelligible, and the truth is neither the body nor in the object, but rather in the language of self-apparent. To illustrate the process of self-apparent, Gadamer introduce the concept of the game, people like to be involved in the language game, the game can not be determined by the individual process, and to follow the rules of the game. The game itself to attract people to participate in the game and let the player in the game of self-expression, the language of the real presence in what it says it in language that is entered into the self-revealed truth of the incident.

2. Gadamer's hermeneutics Gadamer's hermeneutics

not limited to the interpretation of literature, but about art, history, culture and other people's social experience and life practice of understanding. The task of hermeneutics is limited from the start the history of man to seek the fundamental relationship between people and the world, not the interpreter to explain or be explained by the monologue, but the dialogue between them. People's understanding of historical text and history of life is through the exchange of the text continue to open new meaning to show, so the meaning of the text is uncertain, which is different from the human sciences possess the characteristics of natural science. Natural science research is to determine the material facts remain unchanged, so the grasp of the laws of nature that are often used mechanical methods, and human sciences to explain the significance of the understanding of the changes and continue with the filling. Gadamer's Hermeneutics made worthy of the name should be stressed that the historic understanding of the historical existence has its limitations, provided sight to see people on the basis of the previous visible region, then there is how to deal with the limited unlimited spirit? Gadamer proposed the concept of fusion of horizons, as the field is not a closed area, but the movement with us. Different Fields of the two sides began to self-bias will be to understand each other, in the exchange process, to understand the language of those who listen to each other, while breaking the closed nature of their sight, constantly revised to adjust their own prejudices into the world of other people's thoughts, The two sides reached the final in the fusion of horizons to explain the process of dialogue with the text, the interpreter to talk to listen to the original, from its original position to understand the issues behind the problem and propose a new text. Interpreter to new field of understanding the text, re-interpret history, therefore, the interpretation of the text is not simply repeat history, but the interpreter of contemporary living in mind, which is also the history of the work itself in the creation of meaning and interpretation of the works together constitute a work of history, Gadamer called the effect of historical consciousness. Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics is to come in the understanding of the historical survival of mankind, human beings as historical presence in the provisions of history, while also continue to make history. History of human understanding is the last requirement applies to the current situation, in the past have an effect on the present, while now also have an effect on the past, the horizon of the past and present continuous integration of sight, the effect of history is a dynamic history of the effect of the historical principles of Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics became his core understanding of the historical hermeneutic has become a new topic.

3, Hans-Georg Gadamer's of the This game concept is proposed, in Gadamer philosophy of language and understanding gained can be generalized, understanding the possibilities have been identified, which, Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics to create possible.

Gadamer that activities implemented in the subjectivity of freedom, but to the very existence of works of art way. the game itself has a unique nature, it is independent of those who engage in gaming activities of human consciousness. Existence does not allow the game player is treated like an object to be treated as game. Therefore, The real subject is not a player, but the game itself, players only get rid of his own sense of purpose and tension can truly say that during the game. So the game itself and tied the game with the charm of those things, because the game makes the player in the game during the process of self-expression or self-performance. The ultimate goal of the game is not possible to achieve the intent, but in the process of implementation intentions. Therefore,coach shoes outlet cursor pointer;, every player self-expression through the game reveals the meaning of the game to be covered. In the course of the game, in order to achieve this self-expression, but also have the participation of the viewer, this reflection is not a detached spectator, but a recognition. .

4, on the The historical investigation of enlightenment is very excellent. That Gadamer that

in Gadamer seems, have seen the philosophy of Hegel Hegel's enlightenment is the basis for Kant, in Kant, enlightenment, or an ability to cultivate close ties it together. Kant, enlightenment is more emphasis on the ability or talent cultivation, cultivation as the main emphasis on this kind of free activities. So Gadamer believes that there can only say that Kant is a self-cultivation, that is, enlightenment 'word. specific existence; It is the entity in the mind to the reality of the transition, turn, turn, while the specific nature of the transition of individual aptitude. This individuality itself for its enlightenment itself that way, but because through this section of enlightenment, it was free to exist, it is able to achieve real existence; it has much enlightenment, it has the power of reality and how much. instinct and direct presence. In a person who reaches such a process, the human nature that people have the spirit of the rational requirements of people who need enlightenment. Hegel saw this, enlightenment is the entity in mind the universality of the direct transition to the reality of it is a simple soul of the entity, there is a possible human condition itself. Only in their own civilized individual, he can develop to his general nature, but also to the development of the real world to him. Gadamer believes that the universality of enlightenment as to improve, but a human mission. It requires to give up the universality of particularity. However, specificity dropped but negative, that is, the suppression of desire, and the resulting object of desire out of control and freedom to the objectivity of objects of desire. items, not just that consumption is correct. Gadamer on . Labor is suppressed desire. Gadamer said: pursuit. He believes that This is because the cultivation of the disposal of some non-direct nature and some strange things, such as those belonging to the memory,true religion shorts australia Affordable SEO Pack, memory and thinking things. Only in this way, enlightenment or theoretical enlightenment of mankind itself was beyond the direct experience of things and reach beyond. Thus, Gadamer that and their separation.

However, this is a truly universal in accordance with the spirit of nature itself. That is,

5, technology and freedom of the shadow of

technology ubiquitous in today, no one can not use the technology, when people commit themselves to technology when,

we must look Technology gives us the freedom to feel the two sides. Gadamer pointed out that on the one hand, This is often ignored by the human short-sightedness. People enjoy the modern technology of fast and comfortable, but in fact it is all give up their freedom of activity related to the premise, between freedom and comfort and convenience, people abandoned the freedom to choose the comfortable. Meanwhile, the relationship between man and the world also lost due flexibility, and simple and average. The result is a dictatorship technology enables us to shift more and more living space into a self-regulatory process of the mandatory structure, the accuracy of the technology shift from control of all decision-making power of people's freedom of decision. Loss of discretion in the absence of people can only live a world of individuality, awareness of the spiritual world is gradually unfamiliar. This is what we experience today is not a unique sense of freedom, that human self-alienation. It is a service activities, and the resulting lack of freedom of any individual can not escape.

Gadamer also from a cultural point of view of the importance of freedom. First, the term culture implies a direct testimony. But in the computer age, our civilization is on the threshold of dramatic changes in, especially since the 19th century, full penetration of science and technology,A Perfect Circle, creating a wave of everywhere there is the control of a civilized world. It is in our lives controlled by a comprehensive technical background, we look forward to bringing our experience, can give us ultimate concern culture that is not a mere body, but we need to nurture the things authoritarianism, on the other hand is the philosophy of needs and essential, between people living in what choice should be made? Gadamer gives comprehensive advice is to take the road, that science and philosophy, theory and practice , or better to say, scientific rationality and the practice of philosophical hermeneutics combined road. Gadamer pointed out that this combination is the moment for self-alienation of human life in consideration of the specific situation, The new self-understanding specificity caused exactly that should be attributed to their surrounding human civilization as we established the dependence of things. pointed out the fundamental characteristics of the technology world is that it is not ideological, in the technology world, people do not think, just calculation. Gadamer on the way to solve this problem to be more modest and realistic, that is, recognition of scientific is reasonable,abercrombie shop, but must get rid of the threat of its dependence, to achieve true self-awareness to be truly free.

6, Gadamer's ontology of works of art of

Gadamer reflect on the subject of modern aesthetics based on the experience of art proposed new way of thinking, his way from the existence of works of art to illustrate understanding of the phenomenon, the meaning of the works in time as a central issue in the generation. He will a foreshadowing of the status, it actually points to Da Moer that the meaning of works of art is difficult to come to an end, . so we easy to understand, in the foundation of philosophical hermeneutics as
Gadamer suggested that we contact first with the work of art is a significant event. so we can not have the Art works only from the existence itself - not the main subject of - starting with the works of art we can understand the relationship between the understanding of the nature of understanding. needs to be noted is: The meaning of hermeneutics, How to become what it understanding of the phenomenon of being.

Gadamer existence of works of art that is with its own order and rules of this sort in the Hershey's description. People are generally taken for granted as the game's main man, the main concern is to bring freedom to the game, as in the Merle just want to remove from Kant, Schiller has been such a subjective sense of the game - like Heidegger us: the game is not really the main players, but the game itself.

in by the performance of such an event out of something meaningful. dominated activities, beyond the horizon of their own and reach a and methodology of hermeneutics; but from the existence of possible problems on the note explains, which was even more groundbreaking work. If we agree that the open work of art itself, agree that human beings as the historical existence of such facts; then, gamma Damo Er from the existence of works of art to understand the phenomenon of the discussion demonstrates the superiority, because it goes beyond the aesthetic subject-object dichotomy and understanding of theory, and adhere to the work identity. He told us: the meaning of works of art in the time the game was produced. time as the great protagonist, can act as a It is actually a limit process. This is not only a source of new error is constantly being removed, so that the true meaning of things from all hybrid filter out; but also to the continuous generation of new understanding of the source, making the significance of the unexpected relationship between unfolded.