A tit Tencent Sogou 330,000 yuan and Pi Panpei

: a tit: Tencent and Pi Panpei Sogou 330,000 yuan soft media editorial: Chinese IT film industry has never been no lack of saliva in the early morning I beat you (It appears that local administrative officials are taking part in a major plate of each and every. Staged similar things every day, the real protagonist to it two or three. This is just the situation last year, Pinyin Preliminary Gauge the dispute, the following is in all probability the case from the browser. Lose to shed it, anyway, do ########, do fraud, piracy is performing very good fraction with the cost is revenue, there is superficial. If you will discover days such as the violation might be fined a foreign bankrupt, then China, and may have a real hope of doing innovation. Earn billions a year, tons of countless numbers to make difficulty from a lawsuit, imitation and plagiarism, really wonderful offer. six 22 message, the Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court lately on Sogou v. Tencent to pronounce the case of unfair competition, judgments against Tencent Shenzhen Tencent Personal computer Method Co., Ltd. and Beijing Olympic Grand facts Technologies Co., Ltd. shall cease to provide suspects QQ Pinyin input method software download services and acts of unfair competitors, bogus advertising. At the very same time, the court Tencent complete compensation 331,500 yuan, and in www.qq.com so prominently a statement published seventy-two hrs straight to get rid of the influence. 2009, Beijing Sogou Data Company Co. Ltd. and Beijing Sogou Technologies Improvement Co., Ltd. accused the Tencent QQ Pinyin input technique supplied by the unfair competitors will Tencent Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tencent Laptop or computer Method Co. organizations and also to present for Tencent QQ Pinyin input method to download the service Specifics Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing Olympic Grand court, claims twenty million yuan. November 16 the very same 12 months, the Beijing Second Intermediate Court for the first time hearing the case. Beijing 2nd Intermediate Court underneath the : 1, Shenzhen Tencent Personal computer Program Co., Ltd. to the helpful date from the decision to quit offering suspects > 2nd, the Beijing Olympic Rand Info Technologies Co., Ltd. within the effective date from the decision to quit providing suspects br> c, Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. in the successful date of the decision to quit enticing a user to delete concerned Fourth, Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. in this decision inside 10 days in the date of entry into force, compensation Beijing Sogou Information Service Co. Ltd. and Beijing Sogou Technologies Improvement Co., Ltd. million economic reduction and litigation fairly incurred thirty-one thousand yuan;
5, Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. inside the effective date of this decision within ten days, for its untrue propaganda of the violations involved inside the web site (was: www.qq.com, www.tencent.com, www.tencent.internet) prominently published a statement seventy-two hours straight to remove the influence of (contents of the statement to be audited through the Court, fails to carry out, the Court will probably be issued inside the nation a nationwide newspaper printed the main content material of this decision at the expense of Tencent Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. burden); six, court costs 144,355 yuan, the Beijing Sogou Facts Company Co. Ltd. and Beijing Sogou Technologies Development Co., Ltd. share the burden of 43,355 (already paid), by Shenzhen Tencent Laptop or computer Program Co., Ltd. burden of 500 (entry into force of this decision within 7 days from your date of payment), the Specifics Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing Olympic Grand burden of 500 (entry into force of this decision inside 7 days through the date of payment) by Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. burden of a hundred,000 yuan (in the effective date of this choice inside 7 days to spend.) , really like the world wide web, fell in love with Vista123.com