Dormitory rent land for public plant demolitions s

Sanshui District Court for a trial against the second trial will be public hearing on Thursday

(Reporter Liu Yi Ming) Sanshui a public Ms. Zou village land leased quarters built a plant rental, but a years after the demolitions of illegal buildings identified as. This removal action is a legal basis? When a determination is made illegal the planning department, whether to inform the parties? With these doubts, Ms. Zou 一纸诉状将 City Planning Board to court.
reporter learned yesterday, the recent court verdict against Ms. Zou, second in the Thursday trial.
Event:

rental lease land to build factories have been forcibly evicted

According to plaintiff, Ms. Zou introduced her in 2007, Leping Town, Sanshui District Leping and village committee Celastrus group signed a Since then, Ms. Zou lease land in the 1868 square meters of factory building and dormitory for rent, and in November 1, 2007 completed and put into use.
but a year later, the plant and Leping village houses is forcibly removed. After unsuccessful negotiations with the village committee, Ms. Zou in December 2008 一纸诉状将 Leping sued the village committee, village committee requested Leping loss of more than 680,000 yuan compensation for the plaintiff.
Leping village committee and signed the
Subsequently,sac gucci, Ms. Zou to the Planning Bureau's
focus of controversy

with the new law or old law?
Ms. Zou that she leased 2.8 acres of land and the village committee Leping in time for the construction of the land in January 2007 to 11 months, and day, so the project can not apply the law.
whether to inform the parties?
construction, and can not take corrective measures to eliminate the effects for error of law. At the same time, the Planning Board's
court finds that:

Ms. Zou Planning Board rejected the request without undue

Sanshui district court that Ms. Zou without permission in urban planning area the building, its construction in violation of the
court noted that Ms. Zou's buildings are built without approval of the illegal construction, and its continued existence of illegal status, the Planning Board is being implemented according to the law when investigating the finds nothing wrong. Planning Board did not reach Miss Xiang Zou,
court also said that Ms. Zou building behavior in this case the construction is illegal,louis vuitton handbags, even if there are other similar illegal constructions, also belong to the scope of the Planning Bureau handled separately and does not therefore affect recognized Litigation legitimacy of the Planning Bureau, Ms. Zou claims based on its lack of a denial of justice.
Accordingly,replica outlet, the court rejected the claims of Ms. Zou. Ms. Zou dissatisfied with this decision,ghd purple, Foshan Intermediate People's Court has been appealed, the case will be hearing Thursday.