A dictate of money treatment training, the red and black is constantly the highlight of the game. The corporation also introduced a diversity of education different versions, different focusing of the game, partake players going through a very complicated game, the constantly prolific, even mentioning Hu Empowerment feeling. Common experience is: a win-win cooperation, and bounty, tolerance and so on. But if understanding this stop, the amount of the game, in fact, maximum are a consume.
game told us, just cooperation and win-win situation? Revealed in the game, only the depths of human selfishness, contracted, uncooperative, wrong faith, feisty, cats and dogs, duplicity? Not only that.
Let's look by the entire process of the game (due to the chart of the contents of the another companies, where the standard version, for example):
staff organization:
group of people will be divided into A, B groups, two groups allowed between the commutes, after interior discussions, the cards to each other after the vote, the cards can only be red and black. To keep detach a correspondent for the other side between the two groups announced the cards, correspondent must confirm the A or B group of the cards after the results legal, in array to loosen the other group the cards.
rules of the game:
1, each of the parties choose their own leader, head of the union by the vote, the statistics of how many red cards, the number of black cards, to the path the majority correspondent reports the results of the voting group;
2, the group, at a time one abstained,
Puma Shoes 2011, the vote is invalid, the validity of voting by the correspondent to renounce or validation;
3, scoring rules are It’s about time:
If both sides of the black card, each have 3
If there is one for the red card, the other for the black card, black card is the negative side was 5 points, a red square is 5
If you get both a red card, of a negative 3 points
4, the game must be five votes, the second round score × 2, the fourth round score × 3, the final outcome of the rule is: the highest win total is divided. (Some training courses company, also has two group negotiation chain, let the two groups to communicate, of course, negotiations often can not keep its promise.)
Course of the game:
host announced after the start of the game, team no communication between, but among the group can fully communicate in the meantime, the host will not respond any questions raised by participants in the game. Two groups were separated in two conference rooms, everyone whack, there are few people volunteered to require that when the head immediately, and then issued their election manifesto, and finally, self-confidence is often very strong, eloquent, good people elected.
then began to vote, which is extra chaotic process. Few of the rules of the game foggy, or even no interest; some instant annotate, was asked chose red cards, it was suggested that elected black cards, at loggerheads. But in the end the voice is commonly red preponderated, because their view is: either we undergo, or we win big! While others have picked black big risk: If the other side of the black, we have the opportunity to score, if the other party choose red, his big wastage! More people are two-sided bring, if selected also red line, also choose the black line. The crowd began to have controversies, a different point of view want to convince each other, and some people playing a doze, Landelikuai it all. Like a nice blues!
then began a show of hands vote, voting statistics, the result is all wrong, no verification of the original group members first, second, it was cited double or hand, or do not heave their hands. Confusion, some people began to phone for replacement of head, it was thought undemocratic, and threatened to abstain from the process, particularly the dominant voice. Several times after the waiver, we believe that abstention is a waste of time, so unanimous: Do not waiver! Later, people who propose to abstain feel guilty, neither comes again shouted the. Because games usually begin at night, this time also often already midnight.
soon, to a journalist, reporting requirements, brain of the voting results. This period, pate on entities that do not remove, speak haltingly, drawing boos. Correspondent said: I affirm invalid the results of your group to vote! Correspondent left, the multitude quickly opened city center, there is reflection on the problem, there are requirements for head, for well as investigation rules of the game, chaotic muddle.
If the head of the clear-headed, loud ample, but also to nourish the situation, or he can take the initiative to Yin had. If the case for head, chaos will be repeated until there is a strong ample team leader there.
choose red voice gradually rising. Many-sided swing faction, began to tend to choose red. Choose black in upholding, but their voices more and more. Group results out: choose red! Finally recognized the vote to correspondent, when the results of the first circular out of: A group of selected red, B group selected red. The 2 sides of a negate 3 points.
One interesting result is that if any group of men long, the first round of culling is the result of almost one hundred percent red, and women headed, but occasionally may be selected black cards. Of course, if the correspondent toss a few more women elected head of the tiny chance.
after several rounds of voting process is relatively flat, the results can be speedily out. I have experienced three times in the game, the result appears as with:
the first round of the second round (× 2) third round of the fourth round (× 3) the fifth round of
A Group B Group A Group B Group Group A Group B Group A Group B Group A Group B
red red red red the first black
red red red red second third black
red, black and red,
Puma Jiyu V Wn's Shoes, black and red and black black black
their terminal score is:
first: A group of -2, B -22
second group: A group -10, B group - 20
third: A group of +32, B group -26
which should be eminent that the third field of the Group B leader is a very strong matron, she was insistent to convince you choose black card, of course, team members because of her tight paid the price to make 50 push-ups, and she made a 100.
I believe the game has gone through these three people who will not have the same feelings. For the first game, the fact in the third round of voting, the situation is very gainful, I suggest that we should actors the black card, so fool the enemy, even if the other side of the red, we were fewer losses (because the second round of score to × 2, meantime the fourth round score to × 3), so in the third round, we must a red card, the other party has been misled, this one is most possible a black card, which is a score, with the effect of the final word!
In the second game, either team leader of the change is almost a farce, and finally, by the professors ruthless rebuke: to see how many your aggregate score! How much are you wasting resources, and finally it is a lose-lose!
thespian third game, it seems that in the fourth round of Group B final touched the A group, they also began a black card, of course, this is the strong stance, because they have the odds in hand.
a lot of people do this game through the night, done a lot of people rupture into tears after the game,
Puma Football, what sacred games, there is such a traumatic achieve? This is fair a game it, need it?
life is not a game? But the most important game of life distinction is that we only chance - of life for each of us have only one chance. Game play is not good, we can start over, we can even change the rules of the game, to get the results in our favor, but our life? We have no ability to change any rules, even close the end of the game we will have occasion to know the rules of the game and meaning, this is how sorrowful and frustrating fact!
Let us reminisce, the game gives us the reflection and inspiration:
a team of team leaders and human
election voting process, it is a people focus above the process unfolds. We can discern that some people activity, some people silent, some people confused. For anyone actuator to waken
When correspondent negative group after the vote, often immediate stir within the group, then group leader if strong enough, he will lose the position, but if the team with too strong, he also led the team into the errors, the third game results illustrate this point.
capable after the initial disordered state, there are three basic human face apparently, let us near and look at their eyes, their internal world.
the first human to insist on a red card, they represent the depths of human nature aggressive, attack, selfish and self-oriented. Their slogan is: both triumph the whole world, or completely lost, or with the competitor dead! This is very typical gambler mentality. Or,
Puma Outdoor Shoes, this is the behavior of the wolf.
second, they are gentle and tolerant, they hope to inflate the mart attach with competitors to attain a win-win. They are logical, but more idealism: what they think their tolerance, harmony, and kindness, we will be able to get the same feedback to each other, how they know it must be able to win? Their ideal is conditional, they need to live in appropriate surroundings. Or, this is the behavior of sheep.
third person, who is blind, perplexed, and they lack the wisdom to discriminate right from wrong, they do not even know what they should be out of cards, they are susceptible to induction, we can say that their mind is basically immature , or, is irresponsible, so they either go with the stream, or no position, or just give up.
Then, in the course of the game, there is a reason that is matter-of-fact, full of wisdom, that know how aggressive they know tolerance, indulgence, also know people who give a timely means? No. Because this is the trap game design, game designers just want to through this game, focus on human exposure to the hidden, dingy matter, once and for all, everyone is not faultless, has its own blind specks and errors, unfortunately, their do not know.
therefore, focus on exposing human disability, it is the subtleties of game design.
Second, cooperation and communication, aggressive and give up, we are strong and the weak
when apt aggression, yet when the tolerance? Some human in the opening of the game, favor a digit of ways to communicate with additional members of the group, and finally to approach a win-win position, but in the end can not do so because: First, the team can not communicate among; the second is the original accord, it is cozy destruction and change. In the opening of election, it was recommended that we ought take the initiative to belief! Attracted everyone's to reproach, honesty has a cost! Indeed, a group once the injury presently after becoming combative. This is not a microcosm of life, do we? Business once cheated, now not longer deem that anybody, including my own parents; be a cheat a male dressing glasses, wearing glasses after the see, feel all of them are horrifying. Besides, we live in a globe of asymmetric message, we ambition to communicate, but how much we really spent a idea to communicate? Once the poor communication, we will not give up lightly, and we started to muse the problem are rooted in each additional, because the additional side is so unreasonable, unreasonable and merciless.
It is said that the strong can give the other a black card, because he has the hazard tolerance,
Women Puma Repli Cat, so weak it? The weak can only await for the opportunity (when the other side of the black card), or only a lose-lose? Another subtlety of the game design is to design a
in the game, people easily give up the In the team, occasionally we will not give up easily, because we must consider the collective interest. But we look at the outcome of the game rules: winning total is the maximum points. In fact, if we adhere to abstain, at least we can be So it was that out, but also a kind of wisdom, as the Thirty-Six in the
really lusty, we have to have strong intelligence namely They can lower the figure, they are humble and agreeable, their So strong, they are bad?
real world dominated by the strong, will give the weak mechanism set out, and will protect such a mechanism. But the real weak, can not seize this opportunity? Know how to discontinue, often no longer the weak; and exit of people do not understand, is the real need of conservation, but they often do not understand, who can help got them?
Third, change and change, knowledge and responsibility, commitment and faith
I inquired the man to guide the crew to defeat the group leader, is what forces you to the end? Why do you want spared no exertion to convince you select the black card, even after we poll, you are proficient to withstand the Her faint smile: a responsibility.
namely the liability! What a supremely dull and word language!
reflect on our team, how many times the courage to withstand pressure, mallet to their principles, firmly to the goal and not change the target. Because we are too easy to permit yourself to become amenable, we reasoned that the world is changing, the only constant is change itself, so our goal can be modified to change the intention, strategies can be rebuilt. Our cause is that people in the arena, involuntarily ah.
some time, we insist, hear to any against and critique, we believe that this is right, we are indeed decided to do it, the end result, maybe we succeed, maybe failure, how do we to reflect on it? Is it just to say to yourself: this is God, this is some variety of arrangement, one-third of the workers, 7 fate?
If so, do not we say these words, because everybody knows the total fact, talk out, and have actually chance rubbish. So, what is our guiding principle and no?
first responsibility. As a team leader, we must give up everything for this team. A mother, children in difficulty when in the often amazing burst of strength, will rescue their children, we are celebrating this large motherhood at the same time, think, this power get busy? Is it not responsibility?
In real life, how much to pay for the team leader, comparative to the mother of the children to pay it? State-owned enterprises is clearly impossible, because the leading is named by higher authorities, diverse the mother of to children, fertile woman has experienced afflict, experienced the afflict of childbirth once, unlike in the mother's children, as blood interlinked, Heart matched. Some of the leading mobile call 24 hours a day, and some people think that this is a fastening, only a few people understand, this is responsibility.
followed by wisdom, is based on the wisdom of responsibility, or is based on the wisdom of the responsibility. At first,
Puma Future Cat Low, we may not be smart, but the responsibility can help us do that; first, we are not strong enough, but also a responsibility to help us do this. Wise direction of the responsibility to lest mistakes we made. Who in each other even after the two red cards adhere to the third round of cards is also a black head, her sense of responsibility commendable, but her wisdom gone? After the cards in the first round, the results of their drawback, then they should reflect on strategy, and if the sheep's kindness to accommodate the wolf attacks the sheep really lost everything, but the wolf will be everything. I asked her, why do not you choose to abstain? She was speechless.
If we are willing to martyrdom because the team, then we should spare no effort to become a team leader or team play an momentous character, because it was their responsibility to do. Of course, our location in the team, on the an hand depends on our sense of responsibility, and partial depends on our ability. However, if we become a team leader, does not average we must make one offensive or defensive strategy, we can likewise choose to give up, you can also give up the disregard, which is our right, ah, why should we give up easily this right?
then think of Zhuge Liang's 6 Ky Son. In the traditional literati's mind, 6 Ky Son represents a responsibility, The face of mediocre and incompetent employer, if he really responsible for the general people the world, why did he not replaced? The face of knowing that they are impossible to retrieve the Central Plains of the battle, why he should insist on coming out, until annihilated in battle? This may not have the wisdom and responsibility, but a question of faith. Faith can not be blamed. Team leader for the faith, he will still make blunders, they would be dying, but we can not esteem.
four, the game and Nash equilibrium, the ultimate truth of the universe
fact, red and black game from Tucker (Tucker) 1950, proposed a prototype of the famous game, This is a complete information static game of a typical case. (So-called complete information game is the game the other parties are fully aware of the game side in all cases the loss or acquire, but also know what they are in all cases of loss or gain.)
Basic speculations Prisoner's Dilemma as usual: The police seized two partners criminals, but the lack of sufficient certify opposition their offenses. As long as there is a admitted murderer, will be able to confirm the charges. To get the confession, the police these two criminals were detained to prevent them form a conspiracy of silence. If they both pleaded not guilty, then they will be sentenced to lesser charges of one year in jail; if they have one person conceded to their crimes, the frank, immediate release, without the guilty pleas will be sentenced to 8 years; if they both confessed to their crimes, they will be sentenced to five years in prison each. They can not collude in
and entirely rational, beneath the prelude that everyone must pursue their own interests and not attention to aggrandize the interests of his accomplices, and the other two sides will not believe the spirit of cooperation, the final result, not only achieve their lusted results (each sentenced to five years) that they could not flee the The ending is also known as
This article does not in-depth dispute of game theory and Nash equilibrium, because too many elements that determine the results of a game: both sides know the information is complete (one half of the game a lot of people, it is illegible rules); can communicate (one for each group members will ascertain ways to try to discover each other's information); the agreement are being complied with (if anyone violated an agreement, he is the best interests of proceeds earners); both sides are rational (think almost who insist on a black card group long bar), and so on. In many games, I was startled to find that the real
Why? This is a trap game, or the life of the pitfall?
the basic laws of thermodynamics tells us: We can nor create nor demolish energy. The vigor of the universe is a fixed sum of the beginning and not changed, although stamina can nor be created nor be destroyed, but it can be converted from one fashion to another manner, this is the first law of thermodynamics. That being the case, we are not in any way the consumption of natural energy? Second statute of thermodynamics, when energy is became from one state to another state, we will The discipline is that we lost in the future to do some kind of power for a decisive energy. This is called entropy. Entropy is a element of energy, but it can no longer be transformed into performing, that is, it has no use. In other words, the world we live day by day look no different, even more beauteous, but it is inevitable one day toward the dead. When the silence to an end, re-big bang universe, all overagain. This is similar to Buddhism, said: into, to live, bad air, and this is the truth of the universe. Contemporary science and antique wisdom, was actually surprisingly alike!
once achieved the ultimate truth of the universe, 1:01 to lose and win, what is the point?
need to explain things, basically there will be no victors in red and black game. No one in this game will feel a real win, everyone in the reflection, for his life blind spots and errors, as the depths of human desire for the human form of society.
Finally, think of Mr. Li met with the mainland in April this annual when visiting entrepreneurs, to the four questions, then study time, as the article's end:
1, when we dream of greater success, We have no more hard to arrange?
2, when our dreams become a leader, we have at the service of humility?
3, we often only want to change others, we know when to change yourself?
4, every day when we criticize others, we understand how to do self-reflection?
original author: Ren Zhengping
-------------------- ----------------------
This treatise is procreated from: the wind in the valley: the game of puzzle and mysterious meaning red and black
reading space with QQ Email Subscribe ravine of the air
what is the perusing room?