jordan space jams as bargain BMW circumstance Jian

trial, prosecutors charged: September 7, 2010 11 am, the defendant Wu Tan BMW X6 off-road vehicles driving in the Garden District Xinyi xin'anzhen a actually agreeable time in front of Unit 3, Building 10 parking on the road from east to west, the road conditions deserving to neglect of the car observed the 3-year-old babies Moumou semi knocked down, grinding roll, deserving to misjudgment after distinct to the crushed car rolling Moumou premise, The view off the stall when the hanging for of improper operation of the vehicle into reverse gear causing backward, causing the car on the left front and rear wheels grind again rolling Moumou, Li Moumou caused injuries, died at the hospital died the same daytime. In outlook of the speck after the incident,nike jordan air, the defendant Wu Tan 110,120 fear calls, and waiting to receive treatment in location, can actively alleged guilty, the defendant's relatives, the landlords and relatives of the victims signed a compensation accord, and paid compensation for death, funeral expenses, in affective and so on,tory burch reva flat, relatives of victims to obtain understanding, is a statutory mitigating or extenuating circumstances, constitute negligence in court that the defendant caused the death of people vocation for punishment to the defendant within the sentencing. The defendant has no disapproval to the prosecutor declared.

Photography: Chi ailment
court during the investigation, as prosecutors charged the premier group of evidence, the court play in full from the vehicle into the area to cautious the defendant standing on the roadside five minutes eight seconds throughout the surveillance video. Communication with the network before the difference is that the video display driver on the other side of youth children in car and went to the rear of vehicles during their linger, the direction is forever back to young children. It also shows that the driver did not flee to the incident, but after about 1 minute left called companions, and the phone call police at the scene side of the road.
trial, the trial justice to accept the death, the Crime of criminal negligence, the case in movie surveillance, confession of the accused and the certify, the defendant Wu Tan before reversing the car did not scrutinize the position, there namely no work on the back until the motorcar reversing radar, causing the victim was crushed rolling. Wu Tan by this time the defendant knocked the victim's subjective state of mind namely clearly rolling negligence rather than intentional. Subsequently, the defendant did not timely correct Wu Tan causes to make sure vehicle bumps open the vehicle forward, causing the victim has been grinding roll, this period the defendant Wu Tan namely still not entirely subjective to the duty of attention negligence, the defendant Wu Tan who has been conscious of the problem and hope to get off the detection, the vehicle ought be hanging in the parking stalls on the joystick, but the erroneous tense and shove the lever to the reverse gear on. Then obtain off their car found below the victim, this time down presently after the vehicle has rolled to the victim, the defendant in array to shirk rolling the vehicle re-grind with the victim and ambition to elevator the weapon traffic, but failed to elevate, causing the victim to be crushed again rolling . The evolution of an integrated process of the entire circumstance, the defendant's behave caused the victim, notwithstanding the objective was crushed vehicle rolled several times, but before, during, after the review to determine the circumstances, the defendant is not subjectively want or laissez-faire serious consequences, According to the principle of invariable subjective and objective, the court finds the defendant's behaviour did not constitute intentional homicide.


Full Court likewise considered that afterward the incident the defendant actively shriek the police, waiting for the public security department, a true list of facts of the guilt,air max 90 le, Department of concession may be lighter or alleviated discipline. Defendant pleads guilty, repent, and its close relatives such as detriment of active wage for relatives of sufferers and relatives of victims to acquire the knowing,jordan space jams for sale, can the defendant applicable sentences. According to The defendant's culprit court below the truths, nature, consequences, and its statutory and discretionary with the circumstances, sentenced the defendant to four years imprisonment Wu Tan.
the defendant during the final expression, expressed deep apology for the families of the victims, said, , excuse my fault. motor vehicles within a residential road in reverse, it should anticipate their behavior may endanger the safety of others, due to neglect of observations, the children playing in the car knocked down Qian Li Moumou, rolling, after the vehicle caused at improper operation Li Moumou rolling again, after an injury caused along Moumou death. The defendant's wrongful death doing in accordance with factors of the crime, negligence causing death should be convicted and punished.

prosecutor also submitted to the court, including the confession of the accused, witness proof, forensic conclusions, vehicle inspection report,mbt sports Beijing Women's Final Sprite poisoning, attribute management regulations, police records and additional teams of evidence. None of the accused to dare the evidence, counsel centred nigh the residential property management issues, the court asked the court to melodrama hair compartment vehicles difficulty free access to the video.
In increase, the presiding judge also unraveled that,Parents worried about students to buy toys lottery addiction psychological impact, wrongful death, lawful punishment is 3 to seven years in prison. Surrender the defendant has a statutory mitigating or extenuating circumstances, and the defendant also has pleaded guilty to judge after a assured, genuine repentance, understanding and other relatives of victims made discretionary circumstances, it is their sentences. Combination of three to 5 years in jail prosecutor's sentencing recommendation, the terminal sentence in prison for four years the case.

It is understood that the case happened, the relatives of the victims was December 8, 2010 filed a civil deed, the defendant and the owner of Wu Tan Moumou civilian responsibility. The court presided over the mediation, the two sides reached a settlement agreement voluntarily, Wu Tan and co-owner compensation for relatives of victims Moumou compensation for death, funeral expenses and other economy losses. The portal into force and civil mediation dispatched, relatives of the victims to write a written letter of understanding Yi (Xuzhou), April 29 (Xinhua)
Jiangsu Xinyi rolling 3-year-old kid half to death. At that time portion of the surveillance video online,
reporter eminent that the relatives of the accused during the trial and relatives of the victims were in the ############## face is calm, after the verdict were not argued.



court debate, the 2 sides converge of the argue focused ashore the defendant constituted delinquency causing necrosis or the Crime qualitatively. Prosecutors believe that,ed hardy cheap clothing, along apt the relevant judicial interpretations of the episode,Reporters interviewed civil servants to work games expelled out by security, the region has banned vehicles entering and leaving the community placards and assorted treatment systems, relatively closed road to the area tin no be simply identified for community roads, meantime the incident as a traffic accident.
4 月 29 日 上午 9 30 AM, the closely saw case in Xinyi City People's Court held a public hearing, the regional NPC deputies and CPPCC members, medium correspondents, relatives of the victims, relatives of the accused and the public as almost 200 people to attend the trial. After the trial, the court after a collegiate court that the case made a decision to negligence causing death of First Instance sentenced the defendant to Wu Tan sentenced to 4 years.
of the defendant's conduct would constitute the Crime of doubt, the presiding judge explained that the main distinction between the two charges is the place to discern the accused crime. Traffic crime had occurred within the scope of management in public transport on the road, but in this case taking place within a relatively closed community, not within the scope of management of public transport.