Tod's ShoesTod's Women's shoesTod's Women's shoes9

8 19, Haiyan, Taishan City, a public hearing of the people of Timor village court of the original village under Pitou Village,tods shoes, Long An and Dr. Chen Village 970, sued economic integration of small town society bear the collective economic organizations, members of the violations of rights dispute case. The two sides compete for the focus of the 2004 Village and Small Pei Tam Tam village into a small village of 150 acres of fish ponds after the ownership issue, program, minutes of meetings of the two different resolutions, so that the true wishes of the villagers were cast suspicions; and fraud speak about their experiences, leaving the case that some complicated and confusing.
ponds contract ownership dispute caused

2004, the Timorese village on the area's townships and villages to merge, cancel weirs Omura, their subordinates three villages (Long An, Dr. Chen and salt sources) into a small bear village, the newly formed Little Tan Omura total of six villages. June 2009, a small village with local farmers Tam Chen a, Chen signed an agreement with village village committee the name of the original contract by the weirs and the proceeds awarded to the 150 acres of fish ponds in the two men to cause disputes: What were the weirs combined with the small bear to take When the villagers to look at from the archive records and the relevant resolutions of the meeting only to find the file there are two different materials, content and date of the above in addition to the resolution, the other is exactly the same.
original weirs village villagers believe that the small village bear right to belong to the original contract and receipts Pei Tau Village fish ponds in low-cost contract; Little Tan village, pointed out, and the village Pei Tau villagers when the original commitment, Later, villagers found contradictory materials, suspected fraud, the local government mediation fails repeatedly, it is suggested the two sides take the legal means to resolve disputes, disputes. June 18, chief of the village led the Long An Long An, Wufu two villages 970 villagers in the village to court, 971 the plaintiffs were filled with 89 pages.
false testimony was not in court letter



Cao original instruments Pitou village committee hearing before the pro-national state in a management ownership should be vested? He said in the transcript, the sea fisheries have been given to the end of the management of the village, the village committee in the merge issues, does not agree to sign the merger resolution, the property had already been submitted to the Town House, but in the acceptance stage of merging, the town Government requires one-step merge, or fail to get acceptance of this level. At that time the village committee secretary asked him to play tricks on the information to meet the inspection, the property does not agree to merge into the agreement. fingerprint built Cao Deping agreed. However, given the testimony Cao State failed to submit 10 days before the hearing into the evidence in the directory, the parties file false evidence in court without the letter.
plaintiffs lawyers argued that the testimony was not the key, the key is to override the original contract low weirs tail sea village ponds. Hoi Mei village ponds belong to the original weirs, for this point, the defendant and the third person without objection, the defendant can prove that all the evidence provided by this fact. Therefore, the sea end of village ponds should be under the original weirs Long An, Dr. Chen, Chong Yuen Estate, or their various production teams under the contract, but it upon themselves without letting the defendant go out, so that the plaintiff has suffered economic loss. Cheap contract for a fish pond, said the defendant said that the sea end of the quality of fish ponds and fish ponds adjacent to very different,Tod's Women's shoes, the sea end of the development need to share substantial costs ponds required to transform it into increased production capacity.
views of indigenous villagers in the small bear also many

Village agreements. and materials provided by the village there are certain problems,Tod's Shoes, not only did not cover in accordance with the provisions of the official seal and signature appeared in two participants, like writing the minutes, but the content of the resolution is exactly the opposite. Pei Tau Village original that the new village should not seize the small bear >

funeral how the newspaper will continue to pay attention.