Relocatees were state-owned enterprises , said an

Jiang Zheng Yangcheng Evening News reporter reports: state-owned enterprises in Guangzhou lie demolished, relocatees suffered injustice? 13, the number of media reports has been evicted in Beijing Road, construction of shopping malls that the government lied to expand the road authorities, lie demolished houses will be involved in the case of Guangzhou Road Expansion Project Office (hereinafter referred to as Urban rehabilitation (hereinafter referred to as 13 responded that the two companies: the demolition process and legitimate, there is no
last July, Yuexiu District,louis vuitton outlet, Court of First Instance decision to withdraw compensation and resettlement agreement, rehabilitation company should be in accordance with the Road Widening to do compensation and interest. Road Widening Office and the Guangzhou Urban rehabilitation company that refuses to accept the verdict because, this year has been appealed to the Guangzhou Municipal Intermediate People's Court,
● Plaintiff: developers cheated by the expansion of road demolition

● Defendant: block after two demolition

Zhu plaintiff alleged siblings, brother and sister 3 No. 318 Beijing Road is a two-storey housing rights of people, the first floor for shops, on the second floor for the housing, a total of 110 square meters. In 2005, the rehabilitation of the company (mall developers) do come forward to make way for expansion in order to deceive them in the name of the road construction sign a compensation.
However, the road has not been extended to do the demolition in the complex building block construction of public facilities, but the construction of the mall. Once, Zhu siblings saw investment in the newspaper ad, then taken to court. In legal proceedings, the rehabilitation of the company they hastily dismantled houses. Zhu siblings conclude that, rehabilitation company and Road Widening to do malicious collusion, fraudulent,mbt online, so in case of violation of the true meaning of a contract, request the court to revoke the two agreements and to restore the original house, they are willing to return 208 million yuan to the road expansion to do.
nature of commercial land housing project The same land, the demolition of the two projects is the rehabilitation of the time cut-off point demolition company received word Xu (2003), No. 67,
house owners and the two sides signed the demolition notice 'ear expansion compensation and resettlement agreement Society',cheap louis vuitton handbags, have also clearly stated the purpose of the demolition of public housing facilities, complex projects, The relocation compensation policy was entered into co-ear expansion [2005] No. 787 section, and the transfer of housing demolition removed.
● Plaintiff: Shopping contrary to the nature of the original site

● Defendant: required shopping center named road construction on the grounds when the sign is removed, but now is the construction of shopping centers for commercial purposes, contrary to the nature of land for public facilities, there is fraud.
C class public facilities, including comprehensive department stores, shopping malls, Beijing Road, rehabilitation of public facilities, shopping malls can be assigned within the scope. Planning Board for approval in accordance with the nature of the land, this land is the will be benefits. the future financing of urban construction, urban construction, as broaden a way to raise money, and eventually obtained upon request to the interests of urban development for the government. And Zhu Shi Xiongmei after the demolition of housing for commercial facilities, ultimately to be used for urban construction, the Government, in line with public facilities requirements. Therefore, Beijing Road, No. 318,louis vuitton handbags, house demolition process is completely legal, there is no
rehabilitation company believes that new houses have been built in accordance with the verdict if you want to rebuild a new building demolition of old buildings, not practical, thus requiring the second trial. Currently the court has not yet given final and hope that both sides try to coordinate the resolution of disputes. microblogging Recommended | today's micro-blog hot (Editor: SN026)