GHD hair Irons|Sac Louis Vuitton Collection Sai|GH

(Reporter Liu Wei) Hualian Road Engineering Materials Co., Ltd., former general manager Zhu, due to family property was found to exceed the legal income of 800 million, 74 million yuan of corruption,GHD hair Irons, was the first instance court on corruption charges, huge amount of property from unidentified sources sentenced to 18 years, to appeal against Zhu Jun (2 September newspaper reported.) Yesterday, the Second Intermediate People's Court case in the city court of second instance, prosecutors pointed out that the first instance court for error of law, the proposed revision of second instance. Zhu believes that his innocence.
first instance boss jailed for 18 years, state-owned

Zhu, 49,MONCLER SWEATER, had studied in Britain, claiming Ph.D., senior engineer. In early 2005, he was appointed general manager of Hualian state-owned enterprises,Sac Louis Vuitton Collection Sai, the company's main highway asphalt.
2008 年 3 months, the company for losses, Zhu was removed from office. In the following the departure of the financial examination, the audit found that Zhu is not only votes for reimbursement with some meals will also be his wife with glasses, took artistic license, the cost of the concert to see Andy Lau and his son in the get the unit reimbursement. The company immediately reported the matter to the investigating authorities, Zhu indicted to the court.
Court of First Instance examined, June 2005-March 2008 period, Zhu Junli with his office, by means of false claims of 74 million yuan will be illegal for himself. After the incident, investigation organs inquiry, seizure, freezing of the Zhu's family property, in addition to seizure of proceeds of crime and corruption documented legitimate income, 873 million yuan Zhu on the property could not explain the legal sources. Court of First Instance sentenced Zhu to 12 years imprisonment, confiscation of property 20 million; the huge amount of property of unknown origin Zhu was sentenced to imprisonment for 7 years. Decided to implement 18 years imprisonment, confiscation of property 20 million. After the announcement, Zhu refused to accept the appeal.
many excuse not provide evidence

Yesterday, Zhu court that the verdict facts are unclear, insufficient evidence. For the crime of corruption, he said, involved the reimbursement of public spending bills are due, not personal corruption. When the prosecutor allowed to explain the emergence of Andy Lau reimbursement bills concert, practices. Hualian certificate issued by the company claimed that the unit did not strike a balance with the individual invoice system.
Zhu also suggested that some hotels, restaurants, fuel card bills and money, all his units in order to La Shengyi, to the broker or business partner. However, Zhu said the people, not dead, that is, he does not remember the name. For only He can provide names and phone business partner, prosecutors said she tried calling the other side, and Zhu said he only had dinner, there is no economic exchanges.
for the huge amount of property of unknown origin, Zhu also a lot of grounds of appeal. He said that he has a legitimate source of all the property. paper money, and he also stocks to buy Treasury bills and so on,
Zhu Jun, the presiding judge asked the stock unit accounts, investment funds and other details, he is difficult to clarify. Even his family had funded him to buy a house how much money, he can not tell.
the prosecution recommended the second instance court commuted

Zhu sentencing court of first instance was in 2009 Criminal Law Amendment (g) promulgated and implemented. Prior to criminal law, large amounts of property from unidentified sources a maximum penalty of 5 years in prison. The revised Criminal Law stipulates: national staff property, spending significantly more than the legitimate income, the difference is especially huge, can not explain the source, and at 5 to 10 years imprisonment. Zhu Court of First Instance sentenced to 7 years imprisonment for the Criminal Law Amendment (g) requirements.
Yesterday, the city seized the second branch of that court of first instance court prosecutor for an error of law, that the behavior of huge unidentified property Zhu occurred in the Criminal Law Amendment (g) Prior to promulgation and implementation, in accordance with the principles from the old and lighter , which should be in 5 years in prison for the crime the following sentence. Inspectors also noted that after the confirmed, Zhu Jun, 2000 sold a suite, make the difference too, Zhu family property is now more than the difference between the reduction in legitimate income, the proposed court of second instance commuted. Zhu Jun, the objective of the prosecution, a pragmatic attitude of gratitude. Sentencing court is not the case.